Up until a year ago, I was certain that the proper lyrics to the
chorus of Cher’s 1998 hit single “Believe” were: “Do you believe in love
after love?” In actual fact, the lyric goes: “Do you believe in life
after love”. Once Google had confirmed this fact first posed by a friend
of mine I was previously serenading, I could be nothing but
grossly disappointed at this revelation.
I had always thought the first (albeit improper) lyric to be a
profound commentary on modern love’s ebb and flow. Pitting the
singularity of a lover – the “one” the “soul mate” – against a more
modern ideal of nowness and a new love, a fashioned love. Further, I
thought the use of the word “believe” only reinforced Cher’s genius — as
it was supposed by me to be a wink at the dance track’s target
audience: the club-dwelling 90s hipster ironically believing in
something, but only ever believing that they are their own heroes making
their meaning.
But I was wrong. All of this analyses, of course, thrown out the door
when I realized I had BELIEVED too much in Cher’s lyrical abilities.
The truth is that no one really dies from heartache or a break up. Sure
we feel like our hearts have been squeezed and twisted and then sucked
out of our chests, but if you want to get specific, I’ve only ever heard
of the orgasm described as a kind of death by the French, le petite
mort (tiny death). And we should probably stick with the French on this
one, because we all know the French are good at sex (um, they invented
the blowgie) and looking cool while showing clear signs of substance
abuse (smoking, drinking, pastries).
I could give Cher credit and say MAYBE she meant “life after love” in
the French way – referring to the “love” as the sexual death and then
rebirth of a relationship, the “life”. But I fear Cher only meant it in
the American, Billy Ray Cyrus way – “achy breaky heart might blow up and
kill its man, wooo oo wooo”. OK, you could argue that Shakespeare said
you could die of a broken heart – in fact a lot of his characters did.
But I don’t really think, in retrospect, and deducing from the abundance
of glitter and Abercrombie models and Auto-tune present in the video
embedded below, that Cher was really trying to affect a literary crowd
after all.
Too bad. But anyhow she still looks amazeballz, despite the fact that she is basically a fossil. Am I right?
-----
Andrea Grassi is a writer and blogger based in Toronto. For more musings, click: agrassi.com
This post originally appeared on agrassi.com as part of a series called "Sound vs. Quill: An Exercise In Over Analyzing Song Lyrics"
This post originally appeared on agrassi.com as part of a series called "Sound vs. Quill: An Exercise In Over Analyzing Song Lyrics"
0 comments:
Post a Comment